9 reasons why website projects are unsuccessful
If the project is incorrectly encoded, it will often be discarded and started. The cost of solving all of these problems can be significant. Experiencing one of your customers inspires this detailed pitfalls to avoid starting next time with a similar project, whether you're the developer or the customer.
Here are the most common reasons that so many web projects fail.
Definition of Goal and Requirements Unclear Definition
Everyone is so upset that they are leaving but do not think about how this will work and what happens between different scenarios.
This is especially true when a company is set up for the first time online. Most customers think they know what they want, but the devil is in the details. I bet you met a huge number of customers when we tried to detail the process, we did not think about all the consequences.
Make sure you perform detailed planning before you begin building it.  Lack of stakeholders
Management wants a new website to reach corporate goals and increase ROI. Then the management does not take the time to attend when key decisions are made.
Huge issues may arise when management tests the Beta version and finds that it is not what you originally wanted. Changes can be very costly in time and money if they end up at the end of the project instead of being done at the end of the project.
Follow more than cheating
Watch out, chew. Rome was not built in a day. If you have a very complex project you have built it into phases. You do not have to publish all of this on the Internet at the same time. There is nothing wrong with the completion of existing sites after three or four phases.
Designing Sites Without A Goal or Function
You've probably seen nice designs for new projects that you simply can not build or costly to build. It is best to take into account the entire function, taking into account the platform you are using before it is done.
Then, the developer team will work with the designer to create something that is beautiful and functional. Otherwise, you can access a Frankenstein site that does not.
Version Management Does Not Work
Today, you can not build new sites without having to create some kind of source code control system. When developers create, support, and update a large number of source code, coordination can be complicated.
Source control systems record all file modifications, comments in a project. You should be able to reverse functionality, merge work, and work offline. Appropriate source code control is vital to any project
Lack of good project management
Website Project Manager
Project Manager (PM) is a quarter of a football (or number 10) team. The PM is responsible for the successful design, implementation, monitoring, control and closure of a project.
PM needs to understand customer needs and communicate between developers and developers. Without a skilled PM, the project comes down from the field and there will be a fugitive train that ends in the catastrophe. A good PM will publish Weekly Progress Reports, which will keep track of everything.
Default or source code for hacking
Hacking changes the structure of the source code. If an unqualified developer does not know how to do something, they tend to break the code on the site to work. This causes many problems and greatly influences the quality. If a developer fixes a problem and another is raised, it can be a result of many scams.
This makes web site updates for security and bug fixes unimaginable. It also makes it difficult for those who later come to maintain the site and eventually leave the site for exploitable areas.
The main task of the good PM is to keep track of things. Naturally, if you go through the development, you will find new ideas and things. You have to admit that each time you change, each adds the duration and cost of the project.
If a site has been built and tested, you must re-enter it after the change. Some changes are favorable, especially if you make the web site better for users. But many unselfishness and change can squeeze the project out. Spread Creep occurs when decision makers are not early involved or the project does not go through the proper design.
Lack of cohesion quality assurance
Every project is defective, so it's better to find problems first instead of users. Set aside 20% to 25% of development time to complete the appropriate QA. Make sure you have a comprehensive QA plan, otherwise you may receive a site that has many questions.
Developers need to consider quality from day one and take responsibility for their problems. Otherwise, things can be very slim.