Is war of peace doing?

You can see some events after wars, such as the II. World War, and we can ensure that war brings peace. But really? Perhaps it reflects the peace, more than the military victory. If this is true, other factors are important to consider at all levels of peace.

Wars are not like interpersonal conflicts between relationships, families, and communities. In fact, sometimes our wartime attitude would be unhealthy, war would simply be recognized as an interpersonal conflict. The realization that human beings are involved on both sides are real-life implications, and impulses against conflicts.

Wars are like all other conflicts because, because they contain human values, they usually focus on threatened cultural or ethnic identity. People living on at least one side of the conflict will simply see their presence because of their ethnic or cultural clarity. Animosity usually disintegrates against the unilateral human conceptual dehumanization of people. (This discussion suggests that wars may be difficult to sustain if humanity is recognized on both sides of the conflict.)

Examples of this dehumanization include the Nazi destruction of Jews and Gypsies in the Second World War. During World War II, Slovak aggression in Bosnia, tribal genocide in various African regions, and most recently Uzbekistan attacks from Kirghiz in Uzbekistan. On one side of this conflict, the "native land" is called upon to eliminate the various ethnic groups or to expel the various ethnic groups, which they regard as sacred to themselves.

The same attitudes are expressed when the slavery of one race is acceptable and another member deserves it. It is also represented by a race or group seeking a dominant position over the other and describing themselves better. Of course, European and Caucasian treatment naturally include native American populations and eighth and nineteenth-century African slave trade.

These attitudes are also expressed when the members of the variable species move to communities that have only been originated from a single species, as demonstrated by ethnic changes in Western Europe and the United States. Raising different races, cultures and ideologies widens personal identity, often at Community level at national level. Such an extension of personal and ethnic identity is stressful for every community, as it necessitates the development of deeply defined concepts and beliefs. Faced with such changes, the threat of some people and groups could lead to open conflict at these levels, causing any family or community discourse to open a civil war.

These examples show that conflict at all levels is always interpersonal, whether recognized or not. All conflicts involve the relationship, whether recognized or not. Everyone on this planet is somehow connected to each other, regardless of whether they are recognized and recognized or not. We can not do anything at all, which does not affect all the more, even if it is barely noticeable. War is nothing but the international expansion of personal attitudes. War is simply an interpersonal conflict involving organized groups of people.

Interpersonal issues will only be resolved in a completely positive and lasting way if it is beneficial for all participants. It is possible that subversion is the creation of peace because the conflict stops. Subjugation can include one or more elements, one related person, more people within a family or group of people, or lives in a number of local, national or international communities. The rulers never hold exactly because they depend on the subordination of individuals within the ruling community. The detainees will eventually rise to regain power, but this in itself will not create peace. The XX. Century Chinese history, the collapse of the European empires and the evaporation of the twenty-seven-year-old American "empire" are all examples.

Whether it is recognized or not, the empires exist essentially on "loss of prize" basis. Although members of the dominant group or nation may enjoy subjection, trainees may experience loss of autonomy and the loss of personal and cultural identity. Peace can not exist until anger persists. Peace can only appear to the full recognition and appreciation of the need for autonomy and personal expression.

Peace can only be achieved if the controversial elements recognize the "win-win" position, which is beneficial to everyone in every respect. Then, each element is liberated to advance to all the participants for a brighter future, as all the energies are now working harmoniously to achieve the desired result. Finally, peace was created in Europe after the Second World War, precisely because the Allied Powers acknowledged that people in the former Axis nations deserve the prospect of prosperity, especially if lasting peace would only be achieved through common prosperity.

Peace is much more than the end of the conflict. Peace is created when conflicting issues are resolved so that all participants are considered as shared benefits and no one perceives losing their personal status or economic status. Finally, peace is fully grounded when we all find peace – recognizing and appreciating all the controversial elements – within ourselves. Discussions can last for a long time, but in healthy ways that focus on the common good. Peace persists when all respects and values ​​are concerned with the concerns of others, and when they all work together towards a real future for every human being and for all mankind.

Wars do not bring peace. Regardless of the previous conflict, peace comes only with the full reconciliation in which the common aspiration for common humanity and a better future is fully embraced by all concerned.

Comments

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *